The ABC’s of British Columbia’s Dormant Sites

It’s been three years since the inception of the Dormancy and Shutdown Regulation in BC and boy has it affected my job as an environmental consultant!  On the heels of the 2019 Redwater decision, BC regulators took a strong stance against pushing liabilities down the road by regulating site closure timelines to persuade the oil industry to wipe the red from their ledgers.  Admittedly, we’ve all fumbled around a bit over the last few years trying to understand and implement the new requirements in ways that are practical and economical.  With regulatory goalposts that continue to shift and growing ESG requirements it’s important to stay current with regulations and industry best practices. Sometimes this means reviewing the policies driving our work – so I put together a brief review of what I’m calling the ABC’s of Dormant Sites in BC.

A is for Accountability

The first major deadline of the Dormancy Regulation passed quietly last winter.  On December 31, 2021, permit holders were required to have decommissioned at least 30% of their Type A dormant well sites. As I sipped my hot chocolate with my feet up by the fire, I wondered, “what does that even mean?”

After a quick read of the Dormant Sites Manual, you will notice there are a lot of deadlines – different decommissioning, assessment and restoration deadlines for Type A, Type B and Type C sites.  There are deadlines for annual workplans and annual reports.  To ensure accountability, the BC Oil & Gas Commission (BC OGC) follows a graduated non-compliance model and actions range from notices to formal statutory enforcement actions including penalties up to $500,000.

B is for Behavior-Based

As I thought a little longer about the model the BC OGC decided to use, it reminded me of all the goal setting advice I’ve received: Step 1 – Make a plan; Step 2 – Execute the plan; Step 3 – Track how you did and make adjustments; repeat.  And, if you want the goals to really stick then tell a friend – in this case the BC OGC. Implementation of a regular, repeatable, reporting process allows for consistency and predictability, and these are needed to work through the enormous backlog of dormant sites.  Annual deadlines to remember are:

  • January 30 or 60 days before commencing work – Annual Workplans are due
  • March 1 – Annual Reports are due

C is for Clarity

As I’ve helped companies navigate their dormant site obligations, I have appreciated the transparency of the data and information that is available online. The BC OGC External reports page is a resource that I use regularly because it allows me to answer questions like:

  • How many Type A and B dormant sites does my client have?
  • How many have been abandoned?
  • How much liability has the BC OGC assigned for the assessment and remediation of a particular site?

Even though we’re three years in, we’re just starting to tackle the backlog of dormant sites in BC. I’m sure there will continue to be many ways to improve and develop best practices as sites are restored.

Thanks for reading,
Joshua

 


About the Author

Joshua Brown, P.Geo., Manager, NE BC Environmental Services

Joshua is a professional geologist with over 17 years of experience in the environmental and oil and gas industries in northeast British Columbia.  He started his career as a wireline field engineer doing formation evaluations, perforating production zones, casing and cement evaluations and setting plugs and cement to abandon wells. Since 2010, he has developed technical skills in a variety of environmental areas.  He has conducted, managed, and provided technical oversight for groundwater monitoring programs, environmental site assessments, remediation programs and emergency spill response programs. He has worked at upstream and downstream oil and gas sites, landfills, and commercial locations.

Recent Insights

  • Guiding the Path to Progress: How Strategic Regulatory Navigation Accelerated a Critical Energy Infrastructure Project

    In today’s complex energy sector, the ability to work effectively with regulators can mean the difference between project delays and on-time delivery. Through strategic engagement with the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER), 360 recently enabled a major midstream operator to advance their 45-kilometer Class 1 sour gas gathering expansion during a critical environmental restriction period –…

    Read More

  • Unlocking Success in Federally Funded Site Closure Programs: Key Insights from Diverse Experiences

    Since 2019, federally funded upstream site closure programs have become a key avenue for North American administrations to improve environmental quality, create jobs, and support underutilized businesses. Our team became involved in these projects early on and has since participated in federally funded initiatives across seven different states and provinces. This diverse experience has allowed…

    Read More

  • Building Foundations: Canada’s Site Closure Success and Global Outlook

    It’s become a tradition to write a year-end recap in December, reflecting on key industry topics and challenges surrounding site restoration and closure in the energy sector. This year, we’re continuing that theme while expanding to broader topics with a forward-looking perspective. Policy, Regulation, and Industry Trends 2024 has been a steady year for site…

    Read More

  • Leading the Way: Shaping the Future of Environmental Regulatory Compliance

    Industry collaboration is key to addressing the ever-evolving challenges of environmental regulation, particularly in sectors as complex and impactful as oil and gas. Roundtable discussions and forums provide valuable opportunities for stakeholders to come together, exchange insights, and develop collective strategies for navigating regulatory changes. By sharing experiences, concerns, and best practices, these collaborations ensure…

    Read More