Spill management has changed – How does this affect your operations?

Challenging times in the oil and gas industry has put increased pressure on regulatory bodies to identify and characterize the thousands of active and abandoned remedial sites across Alberta.  Since 2014, there has been increased regulatory scrutiny in the historical spill and designated problem site space, primarily in the form of Supplemental Information Request letters (SIR) and Remedial Action Plan (RAP) requests from the AER.

On June 1, 2018, Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP) ratified several changes to the Remediation Certificate Amendment Regulation (RCAR), that will change how spills are managed in the future.   The changes clarify spill reporting requirements and institute timelines where soil and groundwater impacts cannot be fully remediated.

The amendments to the RCAR will result in the following changes in spill management on sites with residual impacts:

  1. The responsible party must either prepare a Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) or commence remediation as soon as possible following the spill; and
  2. If a site cannot be remediated within a 2-year period, a RAP must be submitted that specifies proposed remedial activities and a projected deadline for completion of remediation that satisfies the Director.

The 2018 amendments to the RCAR will force responsible parties with spills to take immediate assessment and remedial action and ultimately define the remedial timeline for every spill.  Operators will no longer be able to remediate offsite impacts and postpone delineation and remediation of onsite impacts for site closure.  As such, ongoing monitoring and assessment will be required.

These changes to the way spills are managed will help both regulators and industry identify the environmental liability associated with new spills, but it will come at a cost.  After a 2-year period, all spills will require RAPs with ongoing monitoring or remedial works.  This means that small onsite spills on active locations will carry a tangible annually liability since each site will require an initial Phase 2 ESA, RAP and monitoring program.

For more information on this, please do not hesitate to reach out.


Chief Liability Officer – 360


Recent Insights

  • Navigating the Human-Tech Partnership: Embracing Soft Skills in an Automated Era

    If my computer had arms, it would probably slap me in the face at the end of my work day.  I swear at it, give it dirty looks, and then throw it in a bag until I need it again.  However, I rely on it to perform most of my daily work routine.  Whether it’s…

    Read More

  • 2023 Year in Review

    Welcome to 360’s last insight of the year. As tradition dictates, the team has scoured the office for anyone willing to support a summary of our year of Insights and has come up empty. The pleasure now falls on me to hit the “high notes” and reflect on the year that was, while we prep…

    Read More

  • Carbon Credits & Site Closure in Canada & the USA – A Win Win Win

    The landscape of environmental site closure in North America is undergoing a dynamic transformation. In both Canada and the USA, the infusion of voluntary carbon credits into the equation is revolutionizing the way we think about site closure projects. These credits serve a purpose far beyond the simple offsetting of emissions; they are becoming a…

    Read More

  • Keep it Simple, Scientists: The Benefits of Applying Risk Principles to Simple Sites

    In the realm of environmental site assessment, it’s often the complexity of the task that can confound even the most experienced scientists. However, what’s sometimes overlooked is the potential for simplicity, and the benefits that come with applying risk-based principles to sites and their associated data. This is particularly relevant when dealing with seemingly straightforward…

    Read More